Badger, R. (2003). Legal and general: toward a genre analysis of newspaper law reports. English for Specific Purposes, 22(3), pp.249-263.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G. , Conard, S. , Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Calsamiglia, H., & Ferrero, C. L. (2003). Role and Position of Scientific Voices: Reported Speech in the Media. Discourse Studies, 5(2), pp. 147-173.
Chafe, W., & Danielewicz, J. (1987). Properties of spoken and written language. In R. Horowitz, and S. J. Samules (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language, (pp. 83-113). San Diego,CA: Academic Press.
Christie, F., & Martin, J. R. (Eds.) (1997). Genre and institutions: social processes in the workplace and school. London: Pinter.
Coffin, C. (2001). 'Theoretical approaches to written language - A TESOL perspective'. In Burns, A and C. Coffin (Eds.) Analysing English in a Global Context. London: Routledge
Dunwoody, S. (1982). A question of accuracy. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC-25, pp. 196-199.
Fahnestock, J. (1986). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 3(3), pp. 275–296.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fowler, R. & Kress, G. (1979). Critical Linguistics, In R. Fowler, R. Hodge, G. Kress, and T. Trew (Eds.), Language and Control, (pp.85- 213). London: Routledge.
Garces-Conejos, P., & Sanchez-Macarro, A. (1998). Scientific discourse as interaction: Scientific articles vs. popularizations. In A. S_anchez-Macarro, and R. Carter (Eds.), Linguistic choice across genres, (pp. 173–190). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gregory, J., and Miller, S. (1998). Science in public: Communication, culture and Credibility. New York: Plenum
Halliday, M. A. K. (1988). On the language of physical science. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features , pp. 162–178. London and New York: Pinter Publishers.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar(Second Edition). London: Arnold.
Halliday, M., A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.
Halliday, M. A. K., and Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (Third edition). London: Arnold.
Hilgartner, S. (1990). The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems Political Uses, Social Studies of Science, 20 (3), pp. 519–39.
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20 (3), pp. 207–226.
Hyland, k. (2003). Graduates gratitude: the generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 22(3), pp. 303-324.
Hyland, K. (2004). Graduates’ gratitude: the generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 23 (3), pp. 303–324.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins
Myers, G. (2003). Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries. Discourse Studies, 5(2), pp. 265–279.
Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. London: University of Wisconsin Press.
Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), pp. 110–135.
O'Donnell, M. (2008). The UAM CorpusTool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration. Proceedings of the XXVI Congreso de AESLA, Almeria, Spain, 3-5 April 2008.
Oliveira, J. M. D., & Pagano, A. S. (2006).The research article and the science popularization article: a probabilistic functional grammar perspective on direct discourse representation. Discourse Studies, 8(5), pp. 627–646.
Parkinson, J. (2002). Popular and academic genres of science: A comparison, with suggestions for pedagogical applications. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Natal, Durban.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English Language. London: Longman
Rowan, K. E. (1989). Moving beyond the what to the why: Differences in professional and popular science writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 19, pp.161- 179
Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21 (1), pp. 1–17.
Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (2), pp. 141–156.
Simpson, R. C., & Swales, J. M. (2001). Corpus linguistics in North America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Soler, V. (2007). Writing titles in science: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes, 26 (1), pp.90–102.
Simpson, P. (1 990). Modality in literary-critical discourse. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholars: Studies in academic discourse, pp. 63-94. Newbury Park: Sage Publication.
Swales, J. M. (1985). Episodes in ESP: A source and reference book on the development of English for science and technology. Oxford: Pergamon.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research Genres: Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ure, J. (1971). Lexical density and register differentiation. In G. E. Perren, and J. L. M. Trim (Eds.) Applications of linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.